Friday, July 28, 2006

Keeping Sane . . .

For every person involved with the issues addressed in this blog - be that person a survivor, a friend, a family member, ally, counselor or educator, etc., it important to remain sane.

What do I mean by that? I think at times I find it easy to obsess on my role in this work. To dwell too long on the stories I hear and the situations I am privileged to know about. To be able to get away and find some rest from this work, have a peaceful moment where I'm not dwelling on the pain and what-ifs, is critical.

I'm no good to myself or others if I'm worn out from too much worry and too much stress. If all I do is ruminate on the pain I witness - if I get too caught up in my own pain. If all I do is focus on the events of one persons inhuman treatment of another then I begin to lose my grip on the goodness life can offer; I start to lose the belief that 'good' can exist, that 'good' can even be generated in this world.

I guess I write this (and again like so many other things with this blog - this won't be the last post on this topic) to remind myself and wish for everyone else a peaceful night, a restful night, a night of healing play/enjoyment. Tonight I wish some 'good' to everyone who reads this. While it may seem far away, 'good' is out there and we all deserve it.

Friday, July 21, 2006

On Stalking . . .

From CNN - Wed, July 19, 2006

John Cusack says he has a stalker
Actor obtains restraining order in Los Angeles court


LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- Actor John Cusack, star of such offbeat films as "Grosse Pointe Blank" and "Being John Malkovich," obtained a restraining order Tuesday against a woman he claims has been stalking him.

***
Okay, I have several thoughts I want to share here:

One, I'm often asked about male victims - yes, it happens. Women can be as abusive and as violent as men. Some men abuse other men, some women are violent to other women, as some men are abusive to women, and as we see here, some women are aggressive to men.

I believe all relationship and sexual violence crimes are under-reported - I have a lot of respect for Mr. Cusack for reporting this woman and her behavior. I also believe it is never okay for anyone to hurt or scare anyone else and if a person is feeling threatened or is attacked - I hope they feel they can report the crime and get the help the feel they need.

When I talk about men answering the call to end violence I am also addressing situations and circumstances where men are being victimized. In situations where relationship and sexual violence occurs it is most often it is men who are the aggressor, and it is more often than not men who are acting against women. However it is no less disturbing when a woman is the aggressor and/or a man is being victimized.

Two, I wish, when situations like this are reported, we could find words other than "claims" or "says" - these words to me feel dismissive of the survivors feelings.

I believe we need to be very clear when we are addressing the victims feelings in these situations. People in Mr. Cusack situation will often report feeling fearful. We need to find a way to let the victim know what they are feeling is real. "Claims", "says" doesn't seem to be the most supportive language.

This isn't to say that the accused should be judged 'guilty' by the press or public opinion - the accused has the right to their day in court.

But the victims feelings are real and as a culture we've too easily dismissed the fear some report feeling.

And what is this "Cusack says he has a stalker" - he "has a stalker" - I have a funny feeling reading that . . . Is the author of the article is suggesting that this is Cusack's stalker, is there some kind of 'possession' or 'ownership' (perhaps not the right words either) on his part of this stalker. It's a bit glib, "he has a stalker."

John Cusack reports someone is stalking him. The stalking is happening to him - and it's something he doesn't want. The stalker is not 'his' stalker (like we should all rush out and find our own stalker now! It's the hip thing to do!). The title of the article seems to suggest some participation on Cusack's part in his being stalked. He does not want to be stalked, he does not want a stalker, this is not his stalker - the stalker is stalking him.

While I'm on the use of language here - the reporter writes "he claims [the woman] has been stalking him." "Has been" - very passive; the stalker 'IS' stalking him - thess events are not happening in the past. This stalking is happening now! We can't minimize the event and by putting it in past tense - she 'has been' stalking him - no, she is stalking him now.

Three, what was CNN thinking posting a report about stalking in the Entertainment section of their website? I understand Mr. Cusack is an actor and therefore part of the entertainment industry. But the 'bigger reality' here: he is a person (just a normal human like you and I) who obtained a restraining order against another person who is stalking him. Is this really entertainment?

CNN has a section of their website devoted to the Law - it seems, given the subject of past articles posted there that an item like this regarding stalking would be better served in that section of the website.

To me this is another example of the press misreporting and misrepresenting an issue related to stalking and assault which further lends to a misunderstanding of these issues.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

News - and What We Don't Read or Hear on the Tape at Eleven.

I’m often sent news articles by friends from a local paper somewhere in the United States or around the world with a ‘news report’ about a sexual assault or some other form of relationship violence. Sometimes these things come over a listserv. I read them but I am also pretty frustrated with what I most often see in the paper.

I’m sure as I continue to develop this blog I will put a few ‘news’ items up here with my thoughts – today however I think want to express my frustrations with the reporting of sexual and relationship violence issues.

Let’s stick to sexual assault and the media today (there a lot to say on this and this entry needs some kind of boundary). Too often what the press 'knows' isn’t what really happened. The press may have a smattering of information, real facts or real details, but the whole story is never there. And for me 'who did what to whom,' while perhaps of interest, isn’t helping end the system of violence against women found in our culture.

Remember as you read this that I’m a male – and I want to be clear that I am male who does not suffer from some form of ‘male guilt’ about assault and relationship violence issues – that’s not why I do what I do, or write what I write. I’m simply a guy who happens to work with an issue that is too often misunderstood and misreported – and I’d like to aid in adding some clarity to the issue. With that said, let’s continue:

What isn’t reported when there is a sexual assault is that we live in a culture that permits sexual assault. In America we have a culture that gives privilege to men. Women as a group, while making great strides toward equality over the past 100 years, are still not in a place of equality in our society. If you doubt that, look to the hard numbers – women still earn less than men (check out this link: http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/Updated2006_C350.pdf) - in 2006 women are still earning less than men! And we all know money is power.

Now I don’t mean to reduce the issue of wage disparity to a sound bite – I know (as the GAO report explores) that there are many factors that influence an individuals pay and I’ve heard many arguments about what allows for this wage disparity exists. The point that seems to be repeated in every report I've read is women are treated in a manner as to be less than equal and men are given power greater than thier female counterparts (in this case power is represented by money, money is power). And the problem with power is that it is too often and too easily 'misused'.

When I look at toys for young girls and boys I find another example of our cultural that works to disadvantage women. This is a generalization (and again I fear another silp into a sound bite) but girls get dolls and girls are taught to nurture (not that this is a bad thing) while boys get Star Wars figures and boys are taught to battle the evil forces (again, not a bad thing in itself). As a culture, however, we tend to not reward the nurturer. Showing care for another isn’t part of the “go get 'em” culture I’ve seen rewarded in the workplace. We don’t seem to value authentic caring and so we don’t reward acts of caring – we do seem to value the “go get 'em” culture and in turn we reward acts that are in line with "go get 'em" (in my example that reward is seen in who earns more money and, remember, money equals power).

So how does this all fit the discussion about how the media reports on sexual assault?

I have never seen a newspaper article explore the responsibility we share in an assault, our culture, the society we support and participate in; I’ve never seen my local paper run a ‘news’ article exploring the idea that we are setting up an imbalance between women and men from those very early childhood days that sets the stage for one group (most often men) to have the ability to believe they can take control or power-over another (most often women). I've never seen an article in my local paper tease out the power issues in our society that mirror the power and control dynamics of a sexual assault. If we can treat someone as less than in the open, in the boardroom, it too easy to do the same and worse elsewhere.

I’m not saying that there is a direct one-to-one relationship between playing with dolls and Star Wars figures to a sexual assault. “Because she played with Barbie and he played with an X-Wing fighter means he raped her” – no, I don’t think like that. What I am saying is that I believe the former (the culture and cultural messaging) contributes to a society that allows the latter (sexual assault). I never read ‘news analysis’ that explores this link.

I’ve read about car accidents where there was an investigation into the factors that make that particular intersection dangerous. “Hey, everyone, dangerous intersection! Cars crashing! Blind spot. We need traffic lights! We need signs! We need to fix that!” We’ll address the factors that contribute to car wrecks in that story. And hopefully the problem will be fixed.

Sexual assaults happen every day but we won't stop sexual assaults until we address the factors which contribute to that crime. We need that conversation and I'm not hearing it in the media. We live at the dangerous intersection everyday and we need to fix that!

What I read and hear too often in a sexual assault story is “he said, she said” – and that’s getting us nowhere. I’m a prevention education specialist – you know what I would like to see in the paper: nothing. No news about sexual assault, no mischaracterization of the issue, no misreporting and no ‘duck and cover’ from the accountability we all share when an assault happens. I’d like there to be no sexual assault news because there is nothing to report on – because no one attacked another person – it didn’t happen.

We can make that happen. But we need to look at why sexual assaults are happening and address those factors. We can't fix the problem if we don't know what the problem is.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

WESH.com - News - New County Law Protects Gay Renters, Home Buyers

Read: New County Law Protects Gay Renters, Home Buyers

I am both happy and sad when I read articles like the one I provide a link to above.

As a man against the kinds of violences this blog addresses I think we need to 'think outside the box'. Those who work in the prevention education and victim advocacy fields recognize that relationship violence issues are most often committed by men. Ending violence isn't about simply stopping abuse, the actual hit, slap, or name calling, etc. - 'thinking outside the box' means addressing some of the larger issues that contribute to violence. For us to end violence we need to address 'men' (both in the specific and as an idea) and the construction of masculinity. This examination must include what men (and women) learn about what it means to be a man (I hesitate to add more here at this time but know that I feel this sentence needs to be expanded upon). Too often the construction of male identity includes the belief that to be a man means being one-hundred and ten percent straight. It seems that the modern day treatment of gay, lesbian, bi-, and transgender people is something that needs to be looked at but it must also be considered as we look at men/male identity.

In time I hope to expand further on these thoughts but today (as I look at the article noted above) I think it's great that our society is doing something to protect the rights of all people and is working to end the privileges held by a certain group of men (simply because these certain men, in this case, happen to be 'straight').

Still I'm sad because this ordinance was necessary in 2006. Violence is about inequality. Violence is about power-over another. I wish the world were such that the Orange County commissioners did not have the need to rule on trying to maintain equality.

Still in a world that needs action and where rights need defending I salute the commissioners for their work on this. As this blog moves forward I hope to find moments like these to celebrate. To me this says we moving in a healthy direction.

Starting today . . .

This blog is new - and while there are many websites that address violence issues - I for one believe there can never be too many. We all need to be active in this struggle. I'm one of many who see that it is time to end stalking, relationship violence and sexual assault. For those new to this work - I hope this blog can serve as a point of conversation and work as a connection to other resources. Starting today we can and will, with our combined efforts, yours and mine, working together, live in a healthier world.